Today is Hans Christian Andersen's 205th birthday. How fitting. Or...not fitting as the story I'm looking at now has nothing to do with him. Ha.
Sooo...
The Snow Child.
Well first of all I should mention how much I bloody love this story. It makes me laugh so much. Congrats Angie you truly surpassed yourself. It's written in the present tense and is quite short, so we guess that Carter meant it as some sort of allegory. It's based on the story
Snow White by the Brothers Grimm, the major difference in that story being that it is the mother, not the father, who makes the wishes for a daughter, gives birth to her then dies shortly after. I think Carter made this alteration to portray the girl as a product of male desire, merely as a projection of how men idealise women. This version of the story was endorsed by Bruno Bettelheim who wrote
The Uses of Enchantment, an analysis of fairytales, in which he claimed fairytales to be portrayals of oedipal conflicts between mother and daughter.
The child is a passive object, and in
the Sadeian Woman Carter explores this kind of character:
"To exist in the passive case is to die in the passive case--that is, to be killed... This is the moral of the fairy tale about the perfect woman".
In this one the man has the power of the narrator, to make things happen at his will ie. create the snow child, he symbolizes controlling, possessive man. He is also portrayed as a pornographer, like in
the Bloody Chamber, clothed, he imagines up the perfect female: naked, pure and ready to defile. Both females in the story are under man's control, and because of that they can only exist as rivals, so the Countess hates the child, which seems to agree with Bettelheim's interpretation of fairytales.
The Count's almost ritual undressing of the Countess displays his power over her, taking away her individuality, and her social status if clothed means civilised and nakedness means inferiority.
In the original of this tale the Count has to choose between the Countess and the child when his wife forces him to, but Carter instead portrays man's ultimate power in not having to choose, being able to assert masculine power over female sexuality.
The objects that inspire the Count's desired child are snow, blood and a raven's feather. There's the obvious implications here, snow meaning purity ie. virginity, blood indicating the violence of man's desire, and the raven is sometimes a symbol of gluttony and the antithesis of the dove's purity.
The Countess' clothes are symbols of her status as wife, but also her dependance on the man, shared by the child which is shown by their transferal to the child's body. The Countess' high heeled, scarlet, spurred boots cast her as the whore of the complex (Madonna whore that is), as a sexual object. Her pelts of black foxes portray her as a wild animal, something base and uncivilised perhaps.
The conclusion to the story is that the child is pierced by the thorn, bleeds and dies. This symbolises the loss of her innocence, the blood could be menstrual or that shed in the loss of virginity. The Count rapes the corpse, showing man to be desperate in sexual desire, and the child melts away, as she has served her purpose to the man, that is her sexual purpose. Her melting also shows her as a part of nature, casting the whole story as male power vs. female sexuality being an allegory for society vs. nature. The death of the puppet of man's ideal woman, and desire, could portray a death of male dominance, as afterwards the Count picks up the rose and offers it to his wide, submitting to her? The fact that the rose bites represents the pain that accompanies female sexuality.
I'm quite proud of that. Think I'll go watch
Lost now.